Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures.
Evaluation approaches have often been developed to address specific evaluation questions or challenges. For example, the Contribution Analysis approach has been developed to address questions about the feasibility of concluding that an intervention has contributed to an outcome in circumstances where a direct causal relationship is difficult to demonstrate.
If you're looking for an approach that's not listed here, it could exist as an evaluation option in the Rainbow Framework. Try using the search tool to find it. If you still can't find it, let us know via the contact form.
List of Approaches
Information is currently available for the following approaches:
A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency.
An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns.
A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data.
An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how.
An impact evaluation approach based on contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and conclusions.
An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference.
An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated.
Various ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity.
An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation.
A participatory approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge so they can monitor and evaluate their own performance.
An approach to learning and improvement that combines self-assessment by local participants and external review by peers.
A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts.
A particular type of case study used to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals.
Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change.
An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes.
An impact evaluation approach which unpacks an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’.
A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation.
A participatory approach which enables farmers to analyse their own situation and develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level.
A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these.
An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries.
An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention.
An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants.
An participatory approach to value-for-money evaluation that identifies a broad range of social outcomes, not only the direct outcomes for the intended beneficiaries of an intervention.
An impact evaluation approach based on identifying and investigating the most successful cases and seeing if their results can justify the cost of the intervention (such as a training course).
Uses the intended uses of the evaluation by its primary intended users to guide decisions about how an evaluation should be conducted.