Addressing gender in impact evaluation

“Gender affects everyone, all of the time. Gender affects the way we see each other, the way we interact, the institutions we create, the ways in which those institutions operate, and who benefits or suffers as a result of this.” (Fletcher 2015: 19)

“Funding agencies around the world need interventions to address gender issues. This is because gender – or rather, judgements on worth related to gender – can result in inequality and injustice.” (Fletcher 2015: 4)

A key question is ‘how should we assess the gender-related impact of interventions?’ In this new publication, Dr Fletcher provides a clear rationale for why an increase in the number of women participants in an intervention is not the same as demonstrating gender impact, and, collecting separate data on males and females (sex-disaggregated data) is not sufficient.

This paper is a resource for practitioners and evaluators who want to include a genuine focus on gender impact when commissioning or conducting evaluations.

This resource and the following information was contributed to BetterEvaluation by Greet Peersman.
 

Authors and their affiliation

Gillian Fletcher, Research Fellow with the Developmental Leadership Program, Institute of Human Security and Social Change, LaTrobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Year of publication

2015

Type of resource

Guide

Key features

The guide helps to clarify the meaning of gender as socially constructed norms and expectations around masculinity and femininity  –and as such, is very different from and not to be confused with biological sex difference between men and women.

The guide explains the implications of this crucial distinction for categorizing interventions with an explicit or implicit gender focus and for assessing their impact on gender-related injustice and inequality.

It provides clear examples of:

  • gender as a category (to be avoided) and gender as a process (to be encouraged) in development interventions
  • articulating gender aspects of an intervention and recognizing gendered patterns in the delivery of interventions
  • the need to go beyond women’s involvement and sex-disaggregated data in assessing gender impact

The guide recommends specific steps in assessing gender-related impact including: understanding and classifying how an intervention seeks to engage with gender; defining gender-sensitive evaluation questions to address gender impact; and, methods and tools that are particularly helpful in answering such questions.

Who is this resource useful for?

  • Evaluators
  • Commissioners/Managers of evaluation
  • Other (those designing or implementing interventions aiming to impact gender issues)

How have you used or intend on using this resource?

The guide was developed as part of the Methods Lab for Impact Evaluation – an action learning research collaboration between the Overseas Development Institute (ODI), BetterEvaluation (BE) and the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

Why would you recommend it to other people?

The author makes a clear and compelling argument for how gender issues should be addressed in all development interventions. She provides: a real-life examples that challenge the pervasive thinking and practice in gender-related work; concrete steps for focusing key evaluation questions on gender-related changes that really matter; and, do-able data collection and analysis methods.

Contents

  1. What to expect from this paper
  2. What is gender?

2.1 Judging difference

2.2 Not just about women: gender as a process, not a category

2.3 Assessing impact in gender intervention

3. What is impact evaluation?

4. Assessing gender-related impact: what helps?

           4.1 Review how (and if) an intervention seeks to engage with gender

           4.2. Classify the approach taken to gender in the intervention

           4.3 Clarify the evaluation purpose

5. Defining evaluation questions to address gender impact

           5.1 Evaluation questions for interventions that can best be categorised as ‘gender blind’, ‘gender exploitative’ or ‘gender accommodating’

           5.2 Evaluation questions for interventions that can best be categorised as ‘gender transformative’

           5.3 Select appropriate data collection and analysis methods

6. Applying a gender lens to development interventions and evaluations

6.1 Articulating gendered aspects of an intervention

6.2 Determining gendered patterns in intervention delivery

6.3 Assessing gender needs and going beyond women’s ‘involvement’

6.4 Including both positive and negative change

7. Conclusion

8. Additional resources

References

Further reading

Source

Fletcher, G. (2015). Addressing gender in impact evaluation. A Methods Lab Publication. London: Overseas Development Institute & Melbourne: BetterEvaluation.

0
No votes yet
Rate this Resource:
This resource is useful for:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Resource Suggested By
Deputy Director/BetterEvaluation Project & Associate Professor/ANZSOG, The Australia and New Zealand School of Government (ANZSOG).
Melbourne, Australia.

Comments

There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.