Combining the ‘Best of Two Worlds’ in Monitoring and Evaluation of Capacity Development

In this chapter, David Watson compares and contrasts conventional results-based approaches with more innovative M & E options and demonstrates how these combine 'the best of two worlds.' 

"The term ‘monitoring and evaluation’ (M&E) tends to conjure up the immediate impression that it is ‘something which donors want done’. This chapter attempts to demystify the term and argues that this function needs a broader interpretation and can be seen as an integral process in all effective organizations or systems." (Watson, 2010)

Contents

  • Notions of capacity: ‘Reductionism’ to ‘systems thinking’
  • Case study evidence of where different approaches to M&E have worked best
  • Planned approaches to capacity development
  • Complex adaptive systems approaches
  • Recent innovations in M&E methodology and applications: The way forward?
  • The accountability issue: Exogenous and endogenous
  • How M&E can contribute to effective capacity development
  • Conclusions for practitioners: Building capacities to deliver

Source

Watson, D. (2010). Combining the ‘best of two worlds’ in monitoring and evaluation of capacity development. In J. Ubels, N. Acquaye Baddoo & A. Fowler (Eds.), Capacity Development in Practice (pp. 239-249). Retrieved from http://www.snvworld.org/sites/www.snvworld.org/files/publications/18_mea...

0
No votes yet
Rate this Resource:

Comments

There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.