Causal inference:Nuts and bolts

This PowerPoint presentation is an extensive guide to understanding causes in an evaluation and the difference its proper diagnosis has on the effectiveness and accuracy of an evaluation.

This excerpt is taken from slide 5 of Davidson (2009) Causal inference:Nuts and bolts

  • "If an “outcome” is not caused by the intervention, it is NOT an outcome; it’s merely a coincidence
  • Coincidences cannot be documented as intervention outcomes
  • Therefore, causal inference is a crucial part of linking inputs to outcomes
  • You do NOT necessarily need a randomised experimental design to infer causation! (although they can be a good option)'

Contents

  • Causation, outcomes and coincidences
  • Two applied examples: 1)Leadership development programme, 2)Performance appraisal & bonus system
  • 8 strategies for inferring causation
  • Hands-on practice
  • Certainty about causation – how certain do we need to be?
  • Guidelines for inferring causation
  • Summary and further references

Source

Davidson E.J (2009), Causal inference:Nuts and bolts, PowerPoint Presentation, Davidson Consulting Ltd. Retrieved from http://realevaluation.com/pres/causation-anzea09.pdf

 

5
Average: 5 (2 votes)
Rate this Resource:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Author
Research Assistant, RMIT University.
Melbourne.

Comments

There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.