Conducting Mixed-Method Evaluations

This technical note from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) provides an overview to using a mixed-options approach for evaluation and outlines some of the important considerations that must be taken into account when using the MM approach. 

Frequently, evaluation statements of work specify that a mix of options be used to answer evaluation questions. This guide includes the rationale for using a mixed-option evaluation design as well as guidance for selecting among options (with an example from an evaluation of a training program) and examples of techniques for analyzing data collected with several different options (including parallel analysis).

Contents

  • Introduction
  • Mixed-option evaluations defined
  • Rationale for using a mixed-option evaluation design
  • Key steps in developing a mixed-option evaluation design and analysis strategy
  • Determining which options to use
  • Selection of data collection options - an example
  • Analyzing data from a mixed-option evaluation - designing a data analysis strategy
  • Example of application
  • Reporting on mixed-options evaluations
  • Table - Options for analyzing mixed-options data

Source

Vondal, P (2010)  Conducting Mixed-Option Evaluations Performance Monitoring & Evaluation TIPS Washington DC, USAID Center for Development Information and Development Evaluation. Retrieved from http://transition.usaid.gov/policy/evalweb/documents/TIPS-ConductingMixedMethodEvaluations.pdf

via USAID

 

4
Average: 4 (1 vote)
Rate this Resource:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Author
Research Fellow, RMIT University.
Melbourne.

Comments

There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.