sustainable development goals

Five considerations for national evaluation agendas informed by the SDGs

This IIED briefing paper advocates for using a ‘complex systems’ lens to approach the follow-up and review of the Sustainable Development Goals and discusses five key aspects of this perspective and their implications for national evaluation agendas. This is the third in a collection of briefings discussing the role of evaluation in achieving the SDGs. Read the first and the second paper in this series.

Evaluation: A crucial ingredient for SDG success

This IIED Briefing paper argues that, in order to be maximally useful to policymakers and citizens, the follow-up and review processes of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development must incorporate rigorous, country led evaluations that examine policy and programme implementation and effectiveness, and build well-reasoned and supported cases for claims of progress. While there is considerable focus on how to measure progress using indicators, the paper argues that evaluation must go beyond measurement, to consider whether progress is equitable, relevant and sustainable. This paper is the first in a series of briefings discussing the role of evaluation in achieving the SDGs. Read the second paper here: Counting critically: SDG ‘follow-up and review’ needs interlinked indicators, monitoring and evaluation

Counting critically: SDG ‘follow-up and review’ needs interlinked indicators, monitoring and evaluation

This IIED briefing paper discusses the role of global indicators in the monitoring and evaluation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) implementation, review and follow-up at the national level. The paper advocates for a greater role of evaluation in follow-up and review processes of the SDGs, especially in voluntary national reviews. This paper is the second in a series of briefings discussing the role of evaluation in achieving the SDGs. Read the first paper here: Evaluation: A crucial ingredient for SDG success.