LeslieGroves | Better Evaluation

Jump to navigation

Home
Search
Overview
Methods and processes
Approaches
What are approaches?

Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures.

Appreciative enquiry

A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Beneficiary Assessment

An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Case study

A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Causal Link Monitoring

An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Collaborative Outcomes Reporting

An impact evaluation approach based on contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and conclusions.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Contribution Analysis

An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Critical System Heuristics

An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Democratic Evaluation

Various ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Developmental Evaluation

An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Empowerment Evaluation

A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Horizontal Evaluation

A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Innovation History

A way to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Institutional Histories

A particular type of case study used to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Most Significant Change

Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Outcome Harvesting

An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Outcome Mapping

An impact evaluation approach which unpacks an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Participatory Evaluation

A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Participatory Rural Appraisal

A participatory approach which enables farmers to analyse their own situation and develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Positive Deviance

A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (QUIP)

An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT)

An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Rapid Evaluation

A Rapid Evaluation is an approach that uses multiple evaluation methods and techniques to quickly and systematically collect data when time or resources are limited.

Many terms are used to describe these approaches, including real time evaluations, rapid feedback evaluation, rapid evaluation methods, rapid-cycle evaluation and rapid appraisal. The common feature of these different models is the expedited implementation timeframes which generally range from 10 days to 6 months.

Realist Evaluation

An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Social Return on Investment (SROI)

An participatory approach to value-for-money evaluation that identifies a broad range of social outcomes, not only the direct outcomes for the intended beneficiaries of an intervention.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Success Case Method

The Success Case Method (SCM) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining them in detail. This approach was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff to assess the impact of organisational interventions, such as training and coaching, though the use of SCM is not limited to this context. It is a useful approach to document stories of impact and to develop an understanding of the factors that enhance or impede impact.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Utilisation-Focused Evaluation

An approach to decision-making in evaluation that involves identifying the primary intended users and uses of an evaluation and then making all decisions in terms of the evaluation design and plan with reference to these.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Themes
Resource library
- About the resource library
- Resource collections and projects
Blog
Contribute
Register
Login

BetterEval:World

Contribute content

Search form

Search this site

Filter

Select a content type to filter search results:

Approach
Blog entry
Development Theme
Evaluation Option
Event
FAQ
Forum topic
Language Landing Page
Page
Page One Column
Resources
Task

Home
Overview
Methods and processes
Approaches
What are approaches?

Approaches (on this site) refer to an integrated package of options (methods or processes). For example, 'Randomized Controlled Trials' (RCTs) use a combination of the options random sampling, control group and standardised indicators and measures.

Appreciative enquiry

A strengths-based approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation by identifying and investigating outlier examples of good practice and ways of increasing their frequency.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Beneficiary Assessment

An approach that focuses on assessing the value of an intervention as perceived by the (intended) beneficiaries, thereby aiming to give voice to their priorities and concerns.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Case study

A research design that focuses on understanding a unit (person, site or project) in its context, which can use a combination of qualitative and quantitative data.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Causal Link Monitoring

An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, which identifies the processes required to achieve desired results, and then observes whether those processes take place, and how.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Collaborative Outcomes Reporting

An impact evaluation approach based on contribution analysis, with the addition of processes for expert review and community review of evidence and conclusions.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Contribution Analysis

An impact evaluation approach that iteratively maps available evidence against a theory of change, then identifies and addresses challenges to causal inference.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Critical System Heuristics

An approach used to surface, elaborate, and critically consider the options and implications of boundary judgments, that is, the ways in which people/groups decide what is relevant to what is being evaluated.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Democratic Evaluation

Various ways of doing evaluation in ways that support democratic decision making, accountability and/or capacity.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Developmental Evaluation

An approach designed to support ongoing learning and adaptation, through iterative, embedded evaluation.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Empowerment Evaluation

A stakeholder involvement approach designed to provide groups with the tools and knowledge they need to monitor and evaluate their own performance and accomplish their goals.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Horizontal Evaluation

A particular type of case study used to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Innovation History

A way to jointly develop an agreed narrative of how an innovation was developed, including key contributors and processes, to inform future innovation efforts.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Institutional Histories

A particular type of case study used to create a narrative of how institutional arrangements have evolved over time and have created and contributed to more effective ways to achieve project or program goals.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Most Significant Change

Approach primarily intended to clarify differences in values among stakeholders by collecting and collectively analysing personal accounts of change.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Outcome Harvesting

An impact evaluation approach suitable for retrospectively identifying emergent impacts by collecting evidence of what has changed and, then, working backwards, determining whether and how an intervention has contributed to these changes.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Outcome Mapping

An impact evaluation approach which unpacks an initiative’s theory of change, provides a framework to collect data on immediate, basic changes that lead to longer, more transformative change, and allows for the plausible assessment of the initiative’s contribution to results via ‘boundary partners’.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Participatory Evaluation

A range of approaches that engage stakeholders (especially intended beneficiaries) in conducting the evaluation and/or making decisions about the evaluation.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Participatory Rural Appraisal

A participatory approach which enables farmers to analyse their own situation and develop a common perspective on natural resource management and agriculture at village level.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Positive Deviance

A strengths-based approach to learning and improvement that involves intended evaluation users in identifying ‘outliers’ – those with exceptionally good outcomes - and understanding how they have achieved these.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Qualitative Impact Assessment Protocol (QUIP)

An impact evaluation approach without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended project beneficiaries.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Randomised Controlled Trials (RCT)

An impact evaluation approach that compares results between a randomly assigned control group and experimental group or groups to produce an estimate of the mean net impact of an intervention.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Rapid Evaluation

A Rapid Evaluation is an approach that uses multiple evaluation methods and techniques to quickly and systematically collect data when time or resources are limited.

Many terms are used to describe these approaches, including real time evaluations, rapid feedback evaluation, rapid evaluation methods, rapid-cycle evaluation and rapid appraisal. The common feature of these different models is the expedited implementation timeframes which generally range from 10 days to 6 months.

Realist Evaluation

An approach especially to impact evaluation which examines what works for whom in what circumstances through what causal mechanisms, including changes in the reasoning and resources of participants.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Social Return on Investment (SROI)

An participatory approach to value-for-money evaluation that identifies a broad range of social outcomes, not only the direct outcomes for the intended beneficiaries of an intervention.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Success Case Method

The Success Case Method (SCM) involves identifying the most and least successful cases in a program and examining them in detail. This approach was developed by Robert Brinkerhoff to assess the impact of organisational interventions, such as training and coaching, though the use of SCM is not limited to this context. It is a useful approach to document stories of impact and to develop an understanding of the factors that enhance or impede impact.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it

Utilisation-Focused Evaluation

An approach to decision-making in evaluation that involves identifying the primary intended users and uses of an evaluation and then making all decisions in terms of the evaluation design and plan with reference to these.

Click an approach on the left to navigate to it
Themes
Resource library
- About the resource library
- Resource collections and projects
Blog

This member's profile is currently unavailable.

Is this your profile? Login to update it.

Not a member? Find out about joining us.

LeslieGroves is contributing to BetterEvaluation

Authored this page:

Closing the series on participation in evaluation

Authored this page:

Still Hesitating? Let's bust some myths around increasing stakeholder participation in evaluation

Contributed information to:

Participation in evaluation: Q&A With Irene Guijt and Leslie Groves

Authored this page:

Choices about voices

Authored this page:

Positioning participation on the power spectrum

Authored this page:

Participation not for you? Four reflections that might just change your mind

What is BetterEvaluation?

We are a global collaboration aimed at improving evaluation practice and theory through co-creation, curation, and sharing information.

Get in touch

Recommend content, collaborate, share, ask, tell us what you like, suggest an improvement, or just say hi! We’d love to hear from you.

Help Sitemap Privacy policy Terms of use

Tweets by @BetterEval