Engagement in relevant public processes

For evaluation to be truly useful it needs to be engage in public discussions about relevant issues, especially those involving strategic changes to the way government and non-government organisations plan, manage and implement or how data are gathered, reported and used. 


American Evaluation Association (AEA)

In 2001 and 2002, the American Evaluation Association Task Force on High Stakes Testing developed an AEA position statement on high stakes testing and research reports for evaluators to use to inform themselves.


Advice for USING this option
  • Evaluation associations and societies may consider identifying opportunities for engagement in relevant organisational and public processes and support an ongoing capacity for such engagement (for example, formulating targeted working groups or Task Forces to focus on areas such as government engagement and advocacy).  

This page is a Stub (a minimal version of a page). You can help expand it. Click on Contribute Content or Contact Us to suggest additional resources, share your experience using the method, or volunteer to expand description.


Peersman, G. and Rogers, P. (2017). Pathways to advance professionalisation within the context of the Australasian Evaluation Society. Melbourne: ANZSOG/BetterEvaluation. Retrieved from:  https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/resources/pathways-advance-professio...


Cite this page

Peersman, P. and Rogers, P. (2018). Engagement in relevant public processes. BetterEvaluation. Retrieved from https://www.betterevaluation.org/en/evaluation-options/engagement-releva...

Updated: 2nd August 2018 - 5:45pm
This Option is useful for:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Director, Evaluation Capacity Strengthening, BetterEvaluation.
Melbourne, Australia.
Founder and former-CEO, BetterEvaluation.


There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.