Monitoring and evaluation in fragile, conflict-affected and violent (FCV) settings

Fragile, conflict-affected, and violent (FCV) settings come with specific challenges for monitoring and evaluation (M&E), shaped by their instability and complexity.  Understanding how different factors—like political upheaval, social tensions,

Given the complexities and unique challenges of fragile, conflict-affected, and violent environments, understanding how monitoring and evaluation practices have evolved and how to adapt them is crucial.

Monitoring and evaluation in fragile, conflict-affected, and violent settings face significant challenges across logistical, ethical, methodological, and political dimensions.

In fragile, conflict-affected, and violent contexts, monitoring and evaluation practices must be carefully adapted to manage the complexities and uncertainties of these environments while maintaining ethical standards and promoting positive outcomes.

Successful management in fragile, conflict-affected, and violent (FCV) settings involves careful stakeholder engagement, strategic resource management, context-appropriate design, thorough documentation, and ongoing capacity strengthening to navigate th

In fragile, conflict-affected, and violent (FCV) settings, the task of defining what is to be evaluated is both crucial and complex.

In fragile, conflict-affected, and violent (FCV) contexts, framing the boundaries of an intervention is crucial to ensure that monitoring and evaluation (M&E) activities are contextually appropriate, ethically sound, and adaptable to changing condit

This section covers key tasks related to data collection, management, and the use of indicators in fragile, conflict-affected, and violent (FCV) contexts, with a focus on prioritising safety, contextual relevance, and flexibility in response to the uniq

Effective reporting and supporting the use of evaluation findings in FCV contexts require careful planning and adaptation to the unique challenges these environments present.