Contemporary Thinking About Causation in Evaluation

This paper was produced following a discussion between Thomas Cook and Michael Scriven held at The Evaluation Center and Western Michigan University’s Interdisciplinary PhD in Evaluation program jointly hosted Evaluation Cafe´ event on contemporary thinking about causation and causal inference in evaluation.

Both speakers largely focus on the issues surrounding Randomised Control Trials (RCT'S) and their priority and contention in the field of development evaluation. There is also discussion and reflection on recent methodological developments and alternatives to RCTs for cause-probing investigations in educational and other settings.

Contents

  • Abstract
  • A Dialogue on Contemporary Thinking About Causation
  • Postscripts
  • Appendix A The Present Status of the Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) as a Standard for Causal Investigations in Human Behavior
  • References

Source

Cook, T. D., & Scriven, M., & Coryn, C. L. S., & Evergreen, S. D. H. (2010) Contemporary Thinking About Causation in Evaluation: A Dialogue With Tom Cook and Michael Scriven. American Journal of Evaluation 31(1) 105-117Retrieved from https://www.wmich.edu/sites/default/files/attachments/u58/2015/Contempor...

5
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Rate this Resource:
This resource is useful for:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Author
Research Assistant, RMIT University.
Melbourne.

Comments

There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.