Exploding the Myth of Incompatibility between Accountability and Learning

This chapter from Capacity Development in Practice examines the conflict in the field of Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) between the need for ‘accountability’ and the desire to ensure ‘learning’.

"The tug-of-war between learning and accountability is nonsensical. They need each other. Understanding effectiveness requires both." (Guijt 2010)


  • Exploding the Myth of Incompatibility between Accountability and Learning
  • Understanding the tug-of-war
  • Practical limitations
  • Capacity constraints
  • Economic and political trends
  • Context constraints (and incentives)
  • Organizational culture
  • Philosophical simplicity
  • Ideas that trap and ideas that liberate
  • Trap 1: Defining learning and accountability to see convergence
  • Idea 1: Clarifying learning purposes – including accountability
  • Trap 2: Predicting and controlling an idealized world
  • Idea 2: Adapting expectations of accountability and learning to contextual characteristics
  • Converging capacities
  • Arm-in-arm: Principles, practices and basic good ideas to resolve the tension


Guijt, I. (2010). Accountability and Learning. In Capacity Development in Practice. (pp. 277-291). London, UK: EarthScan. Retrieved from http://snv-website-2015.live.dpdk.com/public/cms/sites/default/files/exp...

No votes yet
Rate this Resource:
This resource is useful for:
A special thanks to this page's contributors
Research Assistant, RMIT University.


There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!

Add new comment

Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.