This brief, authored by John Mayne for the Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative argues the need for a different perspective on causality. That one can still speak of the intervention making a difference in the sense that the intervention was a necessary element of a package of causal factors that together were sufficient to bring about the results.
The brief further argues that theories of change are models showing how an intervention operates as a contributory cause. Using theories of change, approaches such as contribution analysis can be used to demonstrate that the intervention made a difference – that it was a contributory cause – and to explain how and why.
Content
- Concepts of causality
- Fish farming as an example of a causal package
- Demonstrating contributory causes
- Theories of change incorporate causal packages
- Approaches to demonstrating causality
- Theory of change approaches to showing a contributory cause
This resource was suggested to BetterEvaluation by Ronald Mackay.
Source
Mayne, J. 2012. Making causal claims, ILAC Brief No. 26. Rome: Institutional Learning and Change (ILAC) Initiative.
Comments
There are currently no comments. Be the first to comment on this page!
Add new comment
Login Login and comment as BetterEvaluation member or simply fill out the fields below.