Search

Search by keyword

Reset
X Save the Children

2 results

Filter search results

Children in crisis: Good practices in evaluating psychosocial programming
This guide from Save the Children aims to support staff in psychosocial program design and evaluation for projects involving children.
Resource
QuIP in action: Save the Children case study
This resource provides an example of the use of the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP) approach in evaluations of Save the Children's programmes.
Resource

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

Sidebar anchor

Filter by collection

Causal Pathways (1)

Filter by type

Resource (2)

Filter by framework

Filter by audience

Filter by category

Filter by language

English (2)

Filter by country

Mozambique (1)
Tanzania (1)
Zimbabwe (1)

Filter by organisation

80,000 Hours (2)
Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL) (2)
Africa Gender and Development Evaluator’s Network (AGDEN) (1)
African Evaluation Association (AfrEA) (1)
African Evaluation Journal (5)
ALNAP (1)
American Evaluation Association (AEA) (4)
American Indian Higher Education Consortium (AIHEC) (1)
American University (AU) (19)
Aotearoa New Zealand Evaluation Association (ANZEA) (2)
Asamblea Nacional Constituyente - Colombia (1)
Asian Development Bank (ADB) (1)
Asia Pacific Evaluation Association (APEA) (2)
BetterEvaluation (1)
CARICOM (6)
Center for Evaluation Innovation (1)
Centre for Learning in Evaluation and Results in Latin America and the Caribbean (CLEAR-LAC) (1)
Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results Afrique Francophone (CLEAR FA) (6)
Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results for Lusophone Africa and Brazil (CLEAR LAB) (2)
Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results in Anglophone Africa (CLEAR AA) (10)
Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results Pakistan and Central Asia (CLEAR PCA) (3)
Centre for Learning on Evaluation and Results South Asia (CLEAR SA) (3)
Centre for the Evaluation of Complexity Across the Nexus (CECAN) (3)
Child Labour: Action-Research-Innovation in South and South-Eastern Asia (CLARISSA) (1)
Comité Technique du processus de la Politique Nationale de l’Evaluation (PNEval) - Madagascar (1)
Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo Social (CONEVAL) (2)
Consejo Nacional De Política Económica Y Social República De Colombia (CONPES) (1)
Departamento Administrativo de la Función Pública - Colombia (3)
Departamento Nacional de Planeación - Colombia (3)
Department of Health and Human Service - Victoria State Government (1)
Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME) - South Africa (9)
Development Monitoring and Evaluation Office (DMEO) - India (1)
École nationale d'administration publique (ENAP) (1)
European Commission (2)
EUROsociAL (1)
Eval Academy (7)
EvalIndigenous (1)
EvalSDGs (2)
German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval) (4)
Global Affairs Canada (6)
Global Evaluation Initiative (GEI) (40)
Gobierno de México (3)
Independent Development Evaluation, African Development Bank (IDEV) (1)
Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) - The World Bank (3)
Institute of Development Studies (IDS) (8)
Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) (1)
International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS) (2)
International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie) (28)
International Organization for Cooperation in Evaluation (IOCE) (2)
International Strategic Center for Agri-Food Development (ISCAD) (1)
Journal of Development Effectiveness (1)
La Asociación Ibérica de Profesionales por la Evaluación (APROEVAL) (1)
Ministerio de Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación (MAUC) - España (1)
Ministerio de Planificación Nacional y Política Económica (mideplan) - Costa Rica (3)
Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome - Brasil (1)
Ministry of Forecasting, Development and Evaluation of Public Action (MPDEAP) - Government of Benin (1)
Ministry Of Monitoring And Evaluation - Government of Ghana (1)
Ministry of National Development Planning - Zambia (1)
Ministry of National Planning and Development Coordination - Solomon Islands Government (2)
Ministry of Planning - Niger (1)
National Planning Commission, Office of the President - Namibia (1)
Office of the President and Cabinet - Zimbabwe (1)
Office of the Prime Minister - The Republic of Uganda (2)
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (8)
Outcome Mapping Learning Community (6)
Overseas Development Institute (ODI) (5)
Oxfam (4)
Presidencia de la República de Colombia (1)
Probably Good (3)
proEthics (1)
Red Argentina de Evaluación (EvaluAR) (1)
Red de Seguimiento, Evaluación y Sistematización de Latinoamérica y el Caribe (ReLAC) (1)
X Save the Children (2)
State Department for Planning - Kenya (1)
Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) (1)
Tearfund (1)
The Administrative Office of the President - Islamic Republic of Afghanistan (1)
The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation (1)
The National Treasury and Planning - Kenya (1)
The Treasury - New Zealand Government (1)
The World Bank (3)
U.S. Department of State (1)
Uganda Evaluation Association (UEA) (1)
UNICEF (32)
United Nations Development Program (UNDP) (5)
United Nations Evaluation Group (UNEG) (1)
United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) (2)
United States Agency for International Development (USAID) (5)
Western Cape Government (1)
World Food Program (WFP) (2)

Filter by related framework

Filter by tag

Causal Pathways (1)
children (1)
participatory learning & action (PLA) (1)
QUIP (1)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

Children in crisis: Good practices in evaluating psychosocial programming

QuIP in action: Save the Children case study