Search

Search by keyword

Reset
X policy processes

1 results

Filter search results

Clearing the fog: New tools for improving the credibility of impact claims
This IIED Briefing Paper shows that the methods of process tracing and Bayesian updating can facilitate a dialogue between theory and evidence that allows for the assessing of the degree of confidence in ‘contribution claims’ in a transpare
Resource

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

Sidebar anchor

Filter by collection

Causal Pathways (142)
M&E Systems (207)

Filter by type

Resource (1)

Filter by framework

Filter by audience

Filter by category

Filter by language

English (1)

Filter by country

Filter by organisation

Filter by related framework

Filter by tag

X policy processes (1)
3ie (2)
accessibility (5)
accountability (5)
adaptive management (31)
administrative data (3)
advisory group (4)
advocacy (33)
advocacy and campaigning (6)
AEA (3)
AEA14 (3)
AES (9)
AES18 (2)
AES19 (6)
agriculture (5)
ALNAP (5)
analyse data (14)
analytic generalisation (4)
ANZSOG (3)
appreciative inquiry (3)
artificial intelligence (AI) (6)
audio (2)
avaliação (4)
beneficiary exchange (2)
beneficiary feedback (2)
BetterEvaluation (3)
BetterMonitoring (4)
big data (14)
bricolage (2)
budgeting (2)
C4D (6)
capacity (3)
capacity strengthening (20)
card sort (2)
cartoons (2)
case selection (2)
case study (16)
causal inference (11)
causal link monitoring (7)
causal mapping (3)
Causal Pathways (142)
causation (2)
CDC (4)
CEDIL (2)
CGIAR (2)
checklist (8)
child-led evaluation (3)
children (12)
CIPP (2)
climate change (17)
CLM (2)
co-creation (2)
collaboration (3)
collaborative outcomes reporting (3)
colour (2)
Colour palette generator (2)
combining qualitative and quantitative data (3)
communicate findings (7)
communications (6)
community (2)
community of practice (2)
comparative case study (2)
competencies (18)
complex (3)
complexity (18)
complex systems (4)
conference (4)
consultation (9)
contribution analysis (19)
cost-effectiveness (3)
cost benefit analysis (4)
COVID-19 (10)
COVID-19 series (4)
criteria (7)
critical cases (2)
critical systems heuristics (CSH) (6)
culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) (10)
cultural safety (3)
dashboard (7)
data collection (8)
data management (8)
data mining (3)
Datavisualisation (4)
DataViz (20)
decision-making (3)
decolonisation (2)
delphi technique (2)
democratic evaluation (5)
design (4)
developmental (2)
developmental evaluation (7)
develop reporting media (12)
DevResults (2)
DFAT (3)
DFID (2)
dialogues (3)
disaster recovery (2)
ECS (6)
empowerment evaluation (2)
engage (2)
ensure accessibility (2)
environment (22)
equitable evaluation (6)
equity (14)
español (2)
evaluability assessment (8)
evaluating networks (3)
evaluation (4)
evaluation capacity building (4)
evaluation conferences (2)
evaluation design (13)
evaluation framework (9)
evaluation journal (2)
evaluation questions (5)
evaluation standards (10)
evaluation stories (2)
evaluation vs research (4)
evaluative thinking (4)
EvalYear (2)
Excel (3)
facilitation (7)
FCAS (2)
FCV (13)
Feedback (8)
feedback loop (10)
feminist evaluation (17)
final report (4)
Five Whys (3)
focus group (4)
Footprint evaluation (44)
Foresight Evaluation (2)
fragile and conflict affected states (4)
framework (2)
GDPR (2)
gender (16)
gender analysis (7)
gender equity (3)
generalise findings (2)
GeneraTOR (3)
GIS (3)
Global Pulse (2)
global systems (2)
gLOCAL (3)
government (2)
graphic recording (4)
guide (2)
guidelines (6)
health (7)
HIVOS (2)
humanitarian (8)
hypothesis testing (2)
IDRC (3)
IEG (15)
IIED (5)
impact (6)
impact evaluation (87)
impact investing (12)
impact management (2)
impact measurement (6)
inclusion (2)
Indigenous (11)
infographic (4)
innovation (14)
interactive mapping (2)
international development (6)
interviews (6)
KEQs (5)
key evaluation questions (2)
knowledge management (4)
lateral thinking (2)
learning (4)
lessons learned (2)
lessons learnt (4)
LFA (2)
lobbying (2)
logframe (10)
logical framework (5)
logic model (5)
M&E (7)
M&E Systems (207)
machine learning (5)
Made in Africa (2)
manage (3)
manage data (4)
manage evaluation (8)
mapping (4)
maps (2)
matrix (2)
meetings (3)
mental model (3)
mentoring (4)
MESA (14)
methods (3)
Methods Lab (3)
Michael Quinn Patton Rumination (4)
mindmapping (2)
mixed methods (5)
mobile data collection (5)
Monitoring (11)
Monitoring and Evaluation (7)
most significant change (12)
multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) (8)
Multiple lines and levels of evidence (6)
national evaluation capacity (2)
network (4)
Network Evaluation (12)
networks (3)
NVivo (2)
ODI (4)
OECD-DAC (5)
organization performance (3)
outcome evaluation (2)
outcome harvesting (11)
outcome mapping (13)
participation (11)
participatory evaluation (51)
participatory learning & action (PLA) (2)
participatory video (3)
partnership (6)
peer-assessment (2)
peer learning (2)
planning (2)
policy (18)
policy influence (4)
policy research (7)
polling booth (2)
Portugues (7)
Portuguese (7)
power analysis (4)
presentation (4)
principles (3)
privacy (2)
process evaluation (2)
process tracing (18)
professionalisation (2)
program evaluation (6)
program logic (2)
programme theory (4)
program theory (12)
Q-methodology (2)
QCA (9)
qualitative (8)
qualitative analysis (9)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (8)
quasi-experiment (4)
QUIP (16)
rapid evaluation (4)
rapid outcome assessment (2)
RCT (15)
real-time evaluation (4)
realist evaluation (15)
realist synthesis (3)
regression analysis (2)
report (5)
Reporting (13)
reporting media (5)
Request for proposal (3)
research (5)
research impact (3)
research quality (2)
results (2)
rubrics (10)
rural development (2)
sample (7)
science (2)
SDGs (6)
SEIE (2)
self-assessment (3)
sensemaking (2)
situation analysis (2)
SNA (5)
Social analysis (3)
social change (2)
social media (5)
social network analysis (8)
soft systems methodology (2)
stakeholder engagement (4)
stakeholders (4)
statistical (2)
statistics (8)
storytelling (8)
success (2)
supporting use (10)
survey (11)
sustainability (20)
sustainable development goals (4)
synthesising evidence from multiple evaluations (4)
systematic review (8)
systemic thinking (5)
systems (4)
systems thinking (4)
technology (2)
terms of reference (13)
theory of change (23)
timelines (2)
ToC (10)
TOC Software (9)
toolkit (2)
transcripts (4)
transparency (3)
tree map (3)
Twende Mbele (2)
understand causes of outcomes and impacts (3)
UNICEF (4)
unintended consequences (2)
UN Women (5)
USAID (4)
use (2)
use measures and indicators (8)
users (3)
uses (2)
utilisation-focused evaluation (15)
Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4)
validity in case studies (2)
values (3)
video (6)
video series (7)
virtual (2)
visionary evaluation (6)
visualise data (11)
VOPEs (4)
word cloud (2)
writeshop (3)
YEE (85)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

Clearing the fog: New tools for improving the credibility of impact claims