Reimagining the language of engagement in a post-stakeholder world

This article explores how the term "stakeholder" can unintentionally reinforce colonial narratives and systemic inequities.

It highlights that the word is often ambiguous, biased, and exclusionary, which can limit meaningful participation, especially for marginalized groups. The authors argue for more considered language that promotes inclusion, equity, and participation in decision-making. Instead of offering a single replacement term, they encourage "a focus on the people, places, and species affected by decisions, interventions, projects, and issues."

This article brings a thoughtful perspective on the intersection of language and ethics in international development, which has a direct bearing on how evaluators should be thinking about engaging various individuals, groups and affected parties as part of their work.