Search

Search by keyword

Reset
X AEA14

3 results

Filter search results

Week 35: What is Visionary Evaluation?
Today we start a series on "visionary evaluation" - the theme of the 2014 American Evaluation Association conference in October.
Blog
Week 36: Systems thinking
This is #2 in our series on visionary evaluation. This year’s AEA Conference theme is visionary evaluation – systems thinking, equity and sustainability. Which begs the question what is systems thinking?
Blog
Week 37: Why is equity so important in evaluation?
This is #3 in our series on visionary evaluation.
Blog

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

Sidebar anchor

Filter by collection

Causal Pathways (141)
M&E Systems (201)

Filter by type

Blog (3)

Filter by framework

Filter by audience

Filter by category

Filter by language

English (3)

Filter by country

Filter by organisation

Filter by related framework

Filter by tag

X AEA14 (3)
#eval17 (1)
3ie (2)
5Cs (1)
accessibility (4)
accountability (4)
ACFID (1)
action research (1)
activism (1)
adaptive management (30)
administrative data (2)
advisory group (4)
advocacy (31)
advocacy and campaigning (6)
AES (9)
AES17 (1)
AES18 (2)
AES19 (6)
AfrEA 2014 (1)
Africa (1)
after action review (1)
agriculture (5)
alliances (1)
ALNAP (5)
analyse data (13)
analytic generalisation (4)
ANZEA (1)
artificial intelligence (AI) (6)
audience (1)
audio (2)
AusAid (1)
avaliação (4)
awards (1)
baseline study (1)
beneficiary exchange (2)
beneficiary feedback (2)
best practices (1)
BetterMonitoring (4)
big data (14)
Blue Marble (1)
Brasil (1)
bricolage (2)
budgeting (2)
C4D (6)
capacity strengthening (17)
card sort (2)
CARE (1)
cartoons (2)
case selection (2)
case study (16)
caso de estudo (1)
Catholic Relief Services (1)
causal inference (11)
causal link monitoring (6)
Causal Pathways (141)
causation (2)
CDC (4)
CDI (1)
CEDIL (2)
CGIAR (2)
checklist (8)
children (12)
CIPP (2)
citizen participation (1)
CLA (1)
clean data (1)
CLEAR (1)
Clear Horizon (1)
climate change (17)
CLM (1)
co-creation (2)
colour (2)
Colour palette generator (2)
communicate findings (5)
communications (4)
community (2)
community of practice (2)
community scorecards (1)
comparative case study (2)
competencies (18)
complexity (17)
complex systems (4)
concept mapping (1)
conference (4)
consultation (9)
contracts (1)
contribution analysis (19)
correlation (1)
counselling (1)
COVID-19 (10)
COVID-19 series (4)
criteria (7)
critical cases (2)
critical reflection (1)
critical systems heuristics (CSH) (6)
culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) (8)
cultural safety (1)
dashboard (7)
data collection (8)
data management (7)
data rehearsal (1)
Datavisualisation (4)
DataViz (20)
Defra (1)
delphi technique (2)
democratic evaluation (5)
determine what success looks like (1)
developmental (2)
developmental evaluation (7)
develop reporting media (10)
DevResults (2)
DFID (2)
DHHS (1)
disability (1)
disaster recovery (2)
discontinuity (1)
displacement effects (1)
distinct occupational category (1)
East Asia (1)
ECS (6)
educação (1)
EES (1)
election monitoring (1)
email (1)
emotion (1)
emphasis technique (1)
empowerment (1)
empowerment evaluation (2)
engage (2)
engagement in relevant organisational processes (1)
engagement in relevant public processes (1)
ensure accessibility (2)
entrepreneurship (1)
environment (22)
EoY (1)
episode studies (1)
equitable evaluation (6)
equity (13)
español (2)
EU (1)
European Commission (1)
Eval4Action (1)
EvalColombo (1)
EvalPartners (1)
evaluability assessment (7)
evaluation (4)
evaluation capacity building (4)
evaluation conference (1)
evaluation conferences (2)
evaluation design (9)
evaluation failures (1)
evaluation framework (9)
evaluation guide (1)
evaluation journal (2)
evaluation plan (1)
evaluation questions (5)
evaluation standards (10)
evaluation stories (2)
evaluation vs research (4)
evaluative culture (1)
evaluative thinking (4)
EvalYear (2)
Evidence map (1)
exemplars (1)
expectation of ongoing competency development (1)
expert advice (1)
expert review (1)
exploratory statistics (1)
facilitation (7)
FCAS (2)
FCV (6)
Feedback (8)
feedback loop (10)
fellows (1)
fellowship (1)
feminist evaluation (17)
final report (4)
fishbone (1)
focus group (4)
Footprint evaluation (45)
fragile and conflict affected states (4)
framework (2)
GDPR (2)
GEI (1)
gender (16)
gender-based violence (1)
gender analysis (7)
generalise findings (2)
GeneraTOR (1)
globalisation (1)
Global Pulse (2)
global systems (2)
glossary (1)
government (2)
graph (1)
graphic recording (4)
group model building (1)
guide (2)
guidelines (6)
health (5)
HIVOS (2)
humanitarian (8)
human resource development (1)
human resource management (1)
hypothesis testing (2)
ICT (1)
IEG (15)
IIED (5)
illustration (1)
ILRI (1)
impact (6)
impact evaluation (84)
impact investing (12)
impact management (2)
impact measurement (6)
import data (1)
INASP (1)
inception report (1)
inclusion (1)
indicator (1)
Indigenous (11)
Indigenous Australia Program (1)
industry (1)
infographic (4)
innovation (14)
innovation systems (1)
institutional capacity (1)
institutional history (1)
interactive mapping (2)
internal systems (1)
international aid (1)
internet (1)
internship (1)
interviews (6)
iterative TOC (1)
job placement (1)
judgement (1)
KEQ (1)
KEQs (5)
key evaluation questions (2)
lateral thinking (2)
layout (1)
learning (4)
learning alliances (1)
learning from practice (1)
learning partnerships (1)
lessons learned (2)
lessons learnt (4)
LFA (2)
lobbying (2)
logframe (10)
logframes (1)
logical framework (5)
Logicalframework (1)
logical model (1)
logic model (5)
logic models (1)
M&E (7)
M&E Systems (201)
machine learning (5)
Made in Africa (1)
manage data (4)
manage evaluation (6)
Management (1)
managing external consultants (1)
mapping (4)
maps (2)
Marco Logico (1)
matrix (2)
mentoring (4)
merge data (1)
MESA (13)
methodology (1)
metodologias (1)
Michael Quinn Patton Rumination (4)
mindmapping (2)
mixed methods (4)
mobile data collection (5)
model (1)
modelo logico (1)
monitoramento (1)
Monitoring (9)
Monitoring and Evaluation (7)
most significant change (12)
MQP (1)
multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) (8)
Multiple lines and levels of evidence (6)
national evaluation capacity (2)
negative findings (1)
network (4)
Network Evaluation (12)
New Zealand (1)
NGOs (1)
NVivo (2)
OBE (1)
observation (1)
ODI (4)
OECD-DAC (5)
online (1)
OPI (1)
OPM (1)
organization performance index (1)
other professional associations (1)
outcome evaluation (2)
outcome harvesting (11)
outcome mapping (13)
overseas development institute (1)
Oxfam (1)
PACT (1)
parse data (1)
participation (11)
participatory evaluation (49)
participatory learning & action (PLA) (2)
participatory rural appraisal (1)
partnership (6)
peer-assessment (2)
peer learning (2)
performance (1)
photolanguage (1)
planning (2)
PME (1)
policy (17)
policy influence (4)
policy processes (1)
policy research (7)
polling booth (2)
Portugues (7)
Portuguese (7)
post-disaster recovery (1)
power analysis (4)
powerpoint (1)
power structures (1)
presenations (1)
presentation (4)
presentation; slides; (1)
presentations (1)
principle (1)
privacy (2)
private investment (1)
problem tree (1)
process evaluation (2)
process tracing (17)
Professional Development (1)
professionalisation (2)
program design (1)
program evaluation (6)
program logic (2)
program management (1)
programme theory (4)
program theory (12)
public health evaluation (1)
Q-methodology (2)
QCA (8)
qualitative (8)
qualitative analysis (9)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (8)
quasi-experiment (4)
questionnaire (1)
QUIP (16)
R&D projects (1)
rapid outcome assessment (2)
RCT (15)
real-time evaluation (4)
realist evaluation (13)
regression analysis (2)
relationships (1)
report (5)
Reporting (12)
reporting media (5)
research (5)
research quality (2)
results (2)
results framework (1)
RFP (1)
RFQ (1)
rich pictures (1)
river chart (1)
ROA (1)
rolling baselines (1)
rubric (1)
rubrics (6)
rural development (2)
sample (7)
science (2)
SDGs (6)
SEIE (2)
self-paced learning (1)
sensemaking (2)
sensitive issues (1)
SNA (5)
social change (2)
social learning (1)
social media (5)
social media for data collection (1)
social network analysis (8)
Social Networks (1)
Social return on investment (SROI) (1)
social systems (1)
soft systems methodology (2)
software and technology (1)
SoPact (1)
South Asia (1)
Sri Lanka (1)
staff (1)
stakeholder (1)
stakeholder engagement (4)
stakeholders (4)
standards (1)
statistical (2)
statistics (8)
storyboard (1)
storytelling (8)
success (2)
success case method (1)
Superu (1)
supporting use (9)
survey (11)
sustainability (20)
sustainable development goals (4)
sustainable impact (1)
sustainablity (1)
synthesising evidence from multiple evaluations (4)
systematic review (8)
systemic thinking (5)
system mapping (1)
systems (4)
systems in evaluation (1)
systems thinking (4)
tables (1)
technology (2)
Terminology (1)
terms of reference (11)
text mining (1)
The Fred Hollows Foundation (1)
Themes (1)
theory of action (1)
theory of change (22)
timelines (2)
ToC (9)
TOC Software (9)
toolkit (2)
transcripts (4)
Twende Mbele (2)
undefined (1)
UNEG (1)
UNICEF (4)
unintended (2)
UN Women (5)
USAID (4)
use (2)
use measures and indicators (5)
user experience (1)
user journeys (1)
user personas (1)
uses (2)
utilisation-focused evaluation (13)
Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4)
validity in case studies (2)
value for money (1)
value iceberg (1)
video (6)
video series (7)
virtual (2)
visionary evaluation (6)
visualise data (11)
vlookup (1)
Voices (1)
VOPEs (4)
WBG (1)
web (1)
webinar (1)
weighting (1)
word cloud (2)
word tree (1)
World Vision (1)
YEE (65)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

Week 35: What is Visionary Evaluation?

Week 36: Systems thinking

Week 37: Why is equity so important in evaluation?