Search

Search by keyword

Reset
X co-creation

2 results

Filter search results

What are some processes that can be used to get agreement on the Key Evaluation Questions?
The material from BetterEvaluation comes from a combination of curating existing material and co-creating new material. This blog is part of an ongoing series about material that we have co-created with BetterEvaluation users.
Blog
Working with lived and living experience researchers: A practical framework
This blog provides guidance and examples on co-evaluating with lived and living experience (LLE) researchers.
Resource

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Sidebar anchor

Filter by collection

Causal Pathways (142)
M&E Systems (208)

Filter by type

Blog (1)
Resource (1)

Filter by framework

Filter by audience

Filter by category

Filter by language

English (2)

Filter by country

Filter by organisation

Filter by related framework

Filter by tag

X co-creation (2)
#eval17 (1)
5Cs (1)
accessibility (5)
accountability (5)
ACFID (1)
action research (1)
adaptive management (31)
administrative data (3)
advisory group (4)
advocacy (33)
advocacy and campaigning (6)
AEA (3)
AEA14 (3)
AES (9)
AES17 (1)
AES19 (6)
AfrEA 2014 (1)
Africa (1)
after action review (1)
agriculture (5)
alliances (1)
ALNAP (5)
analyse data (14)
analytic generalisation (3)
ANZEA (1)
ANZSOG (3)
appreciative inquiry (3)
artificial intelligence (AI) (6)
audience (1)
AusAid (1)
avaliação (4)
awards (1)
baseline study (1)
best practices (1)
BetterEvaluation (3)
BetterMonitoring (4)
big data (14)
Blue Marble (1)
Brasil (1)
C4D (6)
capacity (3)
capacity strengthening (20)
CARE (1)
case study (15)
caso de estudo (1)
Catholic Relief Services (1)
causal inference (11)
causal link monitoring (7)
causal mapping (3)
Causal Pathways (142)
CDC (4)
CDI (1)
checklist (8)
child-led evaluation (3)
children (12)
citizen participation (1)
CLA (1)
clean data (1)
CLEAR (1)
Clear Horizon (1)
climate change (19)
collaboration (4)
collaborative outcomes reporting (3)
combining qualitative and quantitative data (3)
communicate findings (7)
communications (7)
community scorecards (1)
competencies (18)
complex (3)
complexity (18)
complex systems (4)
concept mapping (1)
conference (4)
consultation (9)
contracts (1)
contribution analysis (19)
correlation (1)
cost-effectiveness (3)
cost benefit analysis (4)
counselling (1)
COVID-19 (10)
COVID-19 series (4)
criteria (7)
critical reflection (1)
critical systems heuristics (CSH) (6)
culturally responsive evaluation (CRE) (12)
cultural safety (3)
dashboard (7)
data collection (8)
data management (8)
data mining (3)
data rehearsal (1)
Datavisualisation (4)
DataViz (20)
DECI (16)
decision-making (3)
decolonisation (3)
Defra (1)
democratic evaluation (5)
design (4)
determine what success looks like (1)
DEval (7)
developmental evaluation (7)
develop reporting media (12)
DFAT (3)
DHHS (1)
dialogues (3)
disability (1)
discontinuity (1)
displacement effects (1)
distinct occupational category (1)
East Asia (1)
ECS (6)
educação (1)
EES (1)
election monitoring (1)
email (1)
emotion (1)
emphasis technique (1)
empowerment (1)
engagement in relevant organisational processes (1)
engagement in relevant public processes (1)
entrepreneurship (1)
environment (23)
EoY (1)
episode studies (1)
equitable evaluation (6)
equity (15)
EU (1)
European Commission (1)
Eval4Action (1)
EvalColombo (1)
EvalPartners (1)
evaluability assessment (8)
evaluating networks (3)
evaluation (4)
evaluation capacity building (4)
evaluation conference (1)
evaluation design (13)
evaluation failures (1)
evaluation framework (9)
evaluation guide (1)
evaluation plan (1)
evaluation questions (5)
evaluation standards (10)
evaluation vs research (4)
evaluative culture (1)
evaluative reasoning (1)
evaluative thinking (4)
Evidence map (1)
Excel (3)
exemplars (1)
expectation of ongoing competency development (1)
expert advice (1)
expert panel (1)
expert review (1)
exploratory statistics (1)
facilitation (7)
FCV (15)
Feedback (8)
feedback loop (10)
fellows (1)
fellowship (1)
feminist evaluation (17)
final report (4)
fishbone (1)
Five Whys (3)
focus group (4)
Footprint evaluation (44)
fragile and conflict affected states (4)
GEI (1)
gender (16)
gender-based violence (1)
gender analysis (7)
gender equity (3)
GeneraTOR (3)
GIS (3)
globalisation (1)
gLOCAL (3)
glossary (1)
graph (1)
graphic recording (4)
group model building (1)
guidelines (6)
health (7)
humanitarian (8)
human resource development (1)
human resource management (1)
ICT (1)
IDRC (3)
IEG (15)
IIED (5)
illustration (1)
ILRI (1)
impact (6)
impact evaluation (87)
impact investing (12)
impact measurement (6)
import data (1)
INASP (1)
inception report (1)
indicator (1)
Indigenous (11)
Indigenous Australia Program (1)
indigenous evaluation (1)
industry (1)
infographic (4)
innovation (14)
innovation systems (1)
institutional capacity (1)
institutional history (1)
internal systems (1)
international aid (1)
international development (6)
internet (1)
internship (1)
interviews (6)
iterative TOC (1)
job placement (1)
judgement (1)
KEQ (1)
KEQs (5)
knowledge management (4)
layout (1)
learning (4)
learning alliances (1)
learning from practice (1)
learning partnerships (1)
lessons learnt (4)
logframe (10)
logframes (1)
logical framework (5)
Logicalframework (1)
logical model (1)
logic model (5)
logic models (1)
M&E (7)
M&E Systems (208)
machine learning (5)
manage (3)
manage data (4)
manage evaluation (8)
Management (1)
managing external consultants (1)
mapping (4)
Marco Logico (1)
meetings (3)
mental model (3)
mentoring (5)
merge data (1)
MESA (14)
methodology (1)
methods (3)
Methods Lab (3)
metodologias (1)
Michael Quinn Patton Rumination (4)
mixed methods (5)
mobile data collection (5)
model (1)
modelo logico (1)
monitoramento (1)
Monitoring (11)
Monitoring and Evaluation (7)
most significant change (12)
MQP (1)
multi-stakeholder partnership (MSP) (8)
Multiple lines and levels of evidence (6)
narrative assessment (1)
national evaluation capacity (3)
negative findings (1)
network (4)
Network Evaluation (12)
networks (3)
New Zealand (1)
NGOs (1)
OBE (1)
observation (1)
ODI (4)
OECD-DAC (6)
online (1)
OPI (1)
OPM (1)
organization performance (3)
organization performance index (1)
other professional associations (1)
outcome harvesting (11)
outcome mapping (13)
overseas development institute (1)
Oxfam (1)
PACT (1)
parse data (1)
participation (13)
participatory evaluation (51)
participatory rural appraisal (1)
participatory video (3)
partnership (6)
performance (1)
photolanguage (1)
PME (1)
policy (18)
policy influence (4)
policy processes (1)
policy research (7)
Portugues (7)
Portuguese (7)
post-disaster recovery (1)
power analysis (4)
powerpoint (1)
power structures (1)
presenations (1)
presentation (4)
presentation; slides; (1)
presentations (1)
principle (1)
principles (3)
private investment (1)
problem tree (1)
process tracing (18)
Professional Development (1)
program design (1)
program evaluation (6)
program management (1)
programme theory (4)
program theory (12)
public health evaluation (1)
QCA (9)
qualitative (8)
qualitative analysis (9)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (8)
quasi-experiment (4)
questionnaire (1)
QUIP (16)
R&D projects (1)
rapid evaluation (4)
RCT (15)
real-time evaluation (4)
realist evaluation (15)
realist synthesis (3)
relationships (1)
report (5)
Reporting (13)
reporting media (5)
Request for proposal (3)
research (5)
research impact (3)
results framework (1)
RFP (1)
RFQ (1)
rich pictures (1)
river chart (1)
ROA (1)
rolling baselines (1)
rubric (1)
rubrics (10)
sample (7)
SDGs (6)
self-assessment (3)
self-paced learning (1)
sensitive issues (1)
SNA (5)
Social analysis (3)
social learning (1)
social media (5)
social media for data collection (1)
social network analysis (8)
Social Networks (1)
Social return on investment (SROI) (1)
social systems (1)
software and technology (1)
SoPact (1)
South Asia (1)
Sri Lanka (1)
staff (1)
stakeholder (1)
stakeholder engagement (4)
stakeholders (4)
standards (1)
statistics (8)
storyboard (1)
storytelling (9)
success case method (1)
Superu (1)
supporting use (10)
survey (11)
sustainability (20)
sustainable development goals (4)
sustainable impact (1)
sustainablity (1)
synthesising evidence from multiple evaluations (4)
systematic review (8)
systemic thinking (5)
system mapping (1)
systems (4)
systems in evaluation (1)
systems thinking (4)
tables (1)
Terminology (1)
terms of reference (13)
text mining (1)
The Fred Hollows Foundation (1)
Themes (1)
theory of action (1)
theory of change (23)
ToC (10)
TOC Software (9)
transcripts (4)
transparency (3)
tree map (3)
undefined (1)
understand causes of outcomes and impacts (3)
UNEG (1)
UNICEF (4)
UN Women (5)
USAID (4)
use measures and indicators (8)
user experience (1)
user journeys (1)
user personas (1)
users (3)
utilisation-focused evaluation (15)
Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4)
value for money (1)
value iceberg (1)
values (3)
video (6)
video series (7)
visionary evaluation (6)
visualise data (11)
vlookup (1)
Voices (1)
VOPEs (4)
WBG (1)
web (1)
webinar (1)
weighting (1)
word tree (1)
World Vision (1)
writeshop (3)
YEE (85)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

What are some processes that can be used to get agreement on the Key Evaluation Questions?

Working with lived and living experience researchers: A practical framework