Search

Search by keyword

1 results

Filter search results

Conversations to have when designing a program: Fostering evaluative thinking
The first step in evaluating a program is knowing whether you can evaluate it – that the program is ‘evaluable’.
/blog/conversations-have-when-designing-program-fostering-evaluative-thinking
Blog

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

Leave this field blank

Sidebar anchor

Filter by type

Blog (1)

Filter by framework

Filter by language

English (1)

Filter by tag

3ie (2)
accessibility (4)
accountability (2)
adaptive management (26)
administrative data (2)
advisory group (3)
advocacy (27)
advocacy and campaigning (6)
AEA (3)
AEA14 (3)
AES (9)
AES18 (2)
AES19 (6)
agriculture (4)
ALNAP (5)
analyse data (11)
analytic generalisation (4)
ANZSOG (3)
appreciative inquiry (3)
audio (2)
avaliação (4)
BetterEvaluation (3)
BetterMonitoring (3)
big data (12)
Brasil (3)
C4D (4)
capacity (3)
capacity strengthening (14)
cartoons (2)
case selection (2)
case study (13)
causal inference (6)
causal link monitoring (2)
CDC (3)
CECAN (2)
CEDIL (2)
checklist (6)
child-led evaluation (3)
children (10)
CIPP (2)
climate change (11)
collaboration (3)
collaborative outcomes reporting (2)
colour (2)
Colour palette generator (2)
combining qualitative and quantitative data (2)
communicate findings (3)
communications (3)
community (2)
community of practice (2)
complex (3)
complexity (13)
complex systems (3)
conference (4)
consultation (9)
contribution analysis (2)
COVID-19 (9)
COVID-19 series (4)
criteria (3)
critical cases (2)
dashboard (7)
data collection (5)
data management (2)
data mining (2)
Datavisualisation (2)
DataViz (19)
decision-making (3)
design (3)
developmental (3)
developmental evaluation (3)
develop reporting media (8)
DevResults (2)
DFAT (3)
DFID (2)
dialogues (2)
disaster recovery (2)
ECS (5)
engage (2)
ensure accessibility (2)
environment (13)
equity (11)
español (2)
evaluability assessment (5)
evaluating networks (3)
evaluation (4)
evaluation capacity building (4)
evaluation conferences (2)
evaluation framework (9)
evaluation questions (5)
evaluation standards (5)
evaluation stories (2)
evaluation vs research (4)
EvalYear (2)
Excel (2)
facilitation (7)
FCAS (2)
Feedback (6)
feedback loop (7)
feedback loops (2)
feminist evaluation (10)
final report (3)
Five Whys (3)
focus group (2)
Footprint evaluation (22)
fragile and conflict affected states (3)
GDPR (2)
GEI (2)
gender (8)
gender analysis (4)
gender equity (2)
generalise findings (2)
Global Pulse (2)
global systems (2)
government (2)
graphic recording (4)
guide (2)
HIVOS (2)
humanitarian (8)
hypothesis testing (2)
IDRC (3)
IEG (5)
IIED (5)
impact (6)
impact evaluation (31)
impact investing (12)
impact management (2)
impact measurement (6)
Indigeneous (3)
Indigenous (3)
infographic (4)
innovation (13)
institutional history (2)
interactive mapping (2)
interviews (5)
KEQs (4)
key evaluation questions (2)
knowledge management (2)
lateral thinking (2)
learning (4)
lessons learned (2)
lessons learnt (4)
lobbying (2)
logframe (9)
logical framework (4)
logic model (3)
M&E (7)
manage (3)
manage data (4)
manage evaluation (4)
mapping (3)
maps (2)
meetings (2)
mental model (3)
methods (3)
Methods Lab (3)
Michael Quinn Patton Rumination (4)
mindmapping (2)
mixed methods (4)
mobile data collection (6)
Monitoring (8)
Monitoring and Evaluation (7)
most significant change (8)
MSP (2)
multi-stakeholder partnership (10)
network (4)
Network Evaluation (9)
networks (2)
New Zealand (3)
NVivo (2)
ODI (4)
OECD-DAC (3)
organization performance (3)
outcome harvesting (4)
outcome mapping (5)
participation (9)
participatory evaluation (25)
participatory video (2)
partnership (5)
partnerships (4)
peer-assessment (2)
peer learning (2)
planning (2)
policy (3)
policy influence (3)
policy research (6)
polling booth (2)
Portugues (7)
Portuguese (9)
presentation (4)
privacy (2)
process tracing (8)
program evaluation (2)
program logic (2)
programme theory (3)
program theory (8)
Q-methodology (2)
qualitative (6)
qualitative analysis (6)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (2)
quasi-experiment (2)
QUIP (4)
rapid evaluation (3)
RCT (8)
real-time evaluation (4)
realist evaluation (4)
realist synthesis (2)
regression analysis (2)
report (5)
Reporting (9)
reporting media (4)
Request for proposal (2)
research (5)
research impact (3)
results (2)
rubrics (7)
rural development (2)
sample (2)
science (2)
SDGs (4)
SEIE (2)
self-assessment (3)
sensemaking (2)
SNA (5)
Social analysis (3)
social change (2)
social media (3)
social network analysis (5)
Social Networks (2)
soft systems methodology (2)
stakeholder engagement (3)
stakeholders (2)
statistical (2)
statistics (6)
storytelling (6)
success (2)
supporting use (7)
survey (7)
sustainability (10)
sustainable development goals (3)
synthesising evidence from multiple evaluations (4)
systematic review (5)
systemic thinking (4)
systems (4)
systems thinking (3)
technology (2)
terms of reference (8)
theory of change (16)
timelines (3)
ToC (8)
TOC Software (9)
toolkit (2)
transcripts (4)
transparency (2)
Uganda (2)
understand causes of outcomes and impacts (3)
UNICEF (10)
unintended (2)
UN Women (4)
USAID (4)
use (2)
use measures and indicators (5)
users (3)
uses (2)
utilisation-focused evaluation (8)
Utilization-Focused Evaluation (4)
validity in case studies (2)
values (3)
video (5)
video series (7)
visionary evaluation (6)
visualise data (10)
VOPEs (2)
writeshop (3)
YEE (3)
X program design (1)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

Conversations to have when designing a program: Fostering evaluative thinking