Conducting mixed-method evaluations

This technical note from the US Agency for International Development (USAID) provides an overview of using a mixed-methods approach for evaluation.

It outlines some of the important considerations that must be considered when using the MM approach. 

Frequently, evaluation statements of work specify that a mix of methods be used to answer evaluation questions. This guide includes the rationale for using a mixed-option evaluation design as well as guidance for selecting among methods (with an example from an evaluation of a training program) and examples of techniques for analyzing data collected with several different methods (including parallel analysis).


  • Introduction
  • Mixed-method evaluations defined
  • Rationale for using a mixed-method evaluation design
  • Key steps in developing a mixed-method evaluation design and analysis strategy
  • Determining which methods to use
  • Selection of data collection methods - an example
  • Analyzing data from a mixed-method evaluation - designing a data analysis strategy
  • Example of application
  • Reporting on mixed-method evaluations
  • Table - Options for analyzing mixed-method data


Vondal, P (2010)  Conducting Mixed-Option Evaluations Performance Monitoring & Evaluation TIPS Washington DC, USAID Center for Development Information and Development Evaluation. Retrieved from



'Conducting mixed-method evaluations' is referenced in: