Search

Search by keyword

Reset
X QUIP

4 results

Filter search results

Attributing development impact: The qualitative impact protocol (QuIP) case book
This freely available, online book brings together case studies using an impact evaluation approach, the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QUIP), without a control group that uses narrative causal statements elicited directly from intended proje
Resource
QuIP and the Yin/Yang of Quant and Qual: How to navigate QuIP visualisations
This discussion paper reviews how quantitative and qualitative processes are utilised in analysis and presentation of data
Resource
Comparing QuIP with thirty other approaches to impact evaluation
This resource outlines how the Qualitative Impact Protocol (QuIP) compares to 30 other impact evaluation approaches.
Resource
Bath social & developmental research ltd. (BSDR) website
BSDR is a non-profit research organisation set up by the authors of the QuIP - a small team of researchers from the Centre for Development Studies (CDS) at the University of Bath - with the ambition to bring more research into practice.
Resource

Help us improve this page

Your feedback is important in helping us improve this website.

What's wrong?

Broken link(s)

Inaccurate information

Other…

Enter other…

Feedback

Email (optional)

Sidebar anchor

Filter by type

Resource (4)

Filter by framework

Filter by language

English (4)

Filter by tag

X QUIP (4)
#eval17 (1)
3ie (2)
5Cs (1)
accountability (2)
ACFID (1)
action research (1)
activism (1)
adaptive management (26)
administrative data (2)
advisory group (3)
advocacy (29)
advocacy and campaigning (6)
AEA (3)
AEA14 (3)
AES (9)
AES17 (1)
AES18 (2)
AES19 (6)
AfrEA 2014 (1)
Africa (1)
after action review (1)
alliances (1)
ALNAP (5)
analyse data (12)
ANZEA (1)
ANZSOG (3)
appreciative inquiry (3)
audience (1)
audio (2)
AusAid (1)
awards (1)
baseline study (1)
beneficiary exchange (1)
beneficiary feedback (1)
best practices (1)
BetterEvaluation (3)
BetterMonitoring (3)
big data (13)
Blue Marble (1)
Brasil (3)
budgeting (1)
C4D (5)
Canada (1)
capacity (3)
capacity strengthening (14)
card sort (2)
CARE (1)
cartoons (2)
case selection (2)
case study (14)
caso de estudo (1)
Catholic Relief Services (1)
causal inference (10)
causal link monitoring (2)
causation (2)
CDI (1)
CECAN (2)
CEDIL (2)
CGIAR (2)
checklist (6)
child-led evaluation (3)
children (10)
CIPP (2)
citizen participation (1)
CLA (1)
clean data (1)
CLEAR (1)
Clear Horizon (1)
climate change (11)
CLM (1)
co-creation (2)
collaboration (3)
collaborative outcomes reporting (3)
colour (2)
Colour palette generator (2)
combining qualitative and quantitative data (3)
communicate findings (3)
communications (3)
community (2)
community of practice (2)
community scorecards (1)
comparative case study (1)
competencies (1)
complex (3)
complexity (14)
concept mapping (1)
consultation (9)
contracts (1)
contribution analysis (2)
correlation (1)
cost-effectiveness (1)
cost benefit analysis (1)
counselling (1)
COVID-19 (10)
criteria (3)
critical cases (2)
critical reflection (1)
dashboard (7)
data collection (8)
data management (3)
data mining (2)
data rehearsal (1)
DataViz (20)
DECI-2 (1)
decision-making (3)
Defra (1)
delphi technique (2)
democratic evaluation (2)
design (3)
determine what success looks like (1)
developmental (3)
develop reporting media (8)
DevResults (2)
DFAT (3)
DFID (2)
DHHS (1)
dialogues (3)
disability (1)
disaster recovery (2)
discontinuity (1)
displacement effects (1)
distinct occupational category (1)
East Asia (1)
ECS (5)
educação (1)
EES (1)
election monitoring (1)
email (1)
emotion (1)
emphasis technique (1)
empowerment (1)
empowerment evaluation (2)
engage (2)
engagement in relevant organisational processes (1)
engagement in relevant public processes (1)
ensure accessibility (2)
entrepreneurship (1)
environment (18)
EoY (1)
episode studies (1)
equity (12)
español (2)
Ethiopia (1)
EU (1)
European Commission (1)
EvalColombo (1)
EvalPartners (1)
evaluability assessment (7)
evaluating networks (3)
evaluation conference (1)
evaluation conferences (2)
evaluation failures (1)
evaluation framework (9)
evaluation guide (1)
evaluation journal (2)
evaluation plan (1)
evaluation questions (5)
evaluation standards (8)
evaluation stories (2)
evaluative culture (1)
EvalYear (2)
Evidence map (1)
Excel (3)
exemplars (1)
expectation of ongoing competency development (1)
expert advice (1)
expert review (1)
exploratory statistics (1)
facilitation (7)
FCAS (2)
Feedback (6)
feedback loop (7)
feedback loops (2)
fellows (1)
fellowship (1)
feminist evaluation (10)
final report (3)
fishbone (1)
Five Whys (3)
focus group (2)
Footprint evaluation (38)
fragile and conflict affected states (3)
framework (1)
GDPR (2)
GEI (2)
gender (8)
gender-based violence (1)
gender equity (2)
generalise findings (2)
GeneraTOR (1)
GIS (2)
globalisation (1)
Global Pulse (2)
global systems (2)
gLOCAL (3)
glossary (1)
government (2)
graph (1)
group model building (1)
guide (2)
guidelines (2)
health (2)
HIVOS (2)
humanitarian (8)
human resource development (1)
human resource management (1)
hypothesis testing (2)
ICT (1)
IDRC (3)
IEG (5)
IIED (5)
illustration (1)
ILRI (1)
impact (6)
impact evaluation (33)
impact investing (12)
impact management (2)
impact measurement (6)
import data (1)
INASP (1)
inception report (1)
inclusion (1)
indicator (1)
Indigeneous (3)
Indigenous (3)
Indigenous Australia Program (1)
industry (1)
innovation (14)
innovation systems (1)
institutional capacity (1)
institutional history (2)
interactive mapping (2)
internal systems (1)
international aid (1)
international development (3)
internet (1)
internship (1)
interviews (5)
job placement (1)
judgement (1)
KEQ (1)
KEQs (5)
key evaluation questions (2)
knowledge management (2)
lateral thinking (2)
layout (1)
learning alliances (1)
learning from practice (1)
learning partnerships (1)
learning selection model (1)
lessons learned (2)
LFA (1)
Liberia (1)
lobbying (2)
logframe (9)
logframes (1)
Logicalframework (1)
logical model (1)
logic model (3)
logic models (1)
M&E (7)
machine learning (3)
Malawi (1)
manage (3)
manage evaluation (5)
Management (1)
mapping (3)
maps (2)
Marco Logico (1)
matrix (2)
meetings (2)
mental model (3)
mentoring (1)
merge data (1)
methodology (1)
methods (3)
Methods Lab (3)
metodologias (1)
mindmapping (2)
mobile data collection (6)
model (1)
modelo logico (1)
monitoramento (1)
Monitoring (9)
Monitoring and Evaluation (7)
most significant change (8)
MQP (1)
MSP (2)
multi-stakeholder partnership (9)
Multiple lines and levels of evidence (6)
national evaluation capacity (1)
negative findings (1)
Network Evaluation (9)
networks (2)
New Zealand (3)
NGOs (1)
Nigeria (1)
NVivo (2)
OBE (1)
observation (1)
online (1)
OPI (1)
OPM (1)
organization performance (3)
organization performance index (1)
other professional associations (1)
outcome evaluation (1)
outcome harvesting (6)
outcome mapping (5)
overseas development institute (1)
Oxfam (1)
PACT (1)
parse data (1)
Parternship (1)
participation (10)
participatory evaluation (26)
participatory rural appraisal (1)
participatory video (2)
partnership (5)
peer-assessment (2)
peer learning (2)
performance (1)
photolanguage (1)
planning (2)
PME (1)
Podems (1)
policy processes (1)
policy research (6)
polling booth (2)
Portugues (7)
Portuguese (7)
post-disaster recovery (1)
powerpoint (1)
power structures (1)
presenations (1)
presentation; slides; (1)
presentations (1)
principle (1)
principles (2)
privacy (2)
private investment (1)
problem tree (1)
process evaluation (2)
process tracing (8)
Professional Development (1)
professionalisation (2)
program design (1)
program evaluation (5)
program logic (2)
program management (1)
program theory (10)
public health evaluation (1)
Q-methodology (2)
QCA (1)
qualitative (7)
qualitative analysis (6)
Qualitative Comparative Analysis (3)
quasi-experiment (2)
questionnaire (1)
R&D projects (1)
rapid evaluation (3)
rapid outcome assessment (1)
RCT (9)
realist synthesis (2)
regression analysis (2)
relationships (1)
report (5)
Reporting (10)
Request for proposal (2)
research (5)
research impact (3)
research quality (1)
results (2)
results framework (1)
RFP (1)
RFQ (1)
rich pictures (1)
river chart (1)
ROA (1)
rolling baselines (1)
rubric (1)
rubrics (7)
rural development (2)
Russia (1)
Rwanda (1)
sample (2)
science (2)
SEIE (2)
self-assessment (3)
self-paced learning (1)
sensemaking (2)
sensitive issues (1)
SNA (5)
Social analysis (3)
social change (2)
social learning (1)
social media (3)
social media for data collection (1)
social network analysis (6)
Social Networks (2)
social systems (1)
soft systems methodology (2)
software and technology (1)
SoPact (1)
South Africa (1)
South Asia (1)
Spain (1)
Sri Lanka (1)
staff (1)
stakeholder (1)
stakeholder engagement (3)
stakeholders (3)
standards (1)
statistical (2)
statistics (7)
storyboard (1)
storytelling (6)
success (2)
success case method (1)
Superu (1)
supporting use (8)
survey (8)
sustainability (17)
sustainable impact (1)
sustainablity (1)
systematic review (7)
system mapping (1)
systems in evaluation (1)
systems thinking (3)
tables (1)
technology (2)
Terminology (1)
terms of reference (9)
text mining (1)
The Fred Hollows Foundation (1)
Themes (1)
theory of action (1)
theory of change (20)
timelines (3)
ToC (9)
TOC Software (9)
toolkit (2)
transparency (2)
tree map (2)
Uganda (2)
undefined (1)
understand causes of outcomes and impacts (3)
UNEG (1)
UNICEF (10)
unintended (2)
use (2)
use measures and indicators (5)
user experience (1)
user journeys (1)
user personas (1)
users (3)
uses (2)
utilisation-focused evaluation (8)
validity in case studies (2)
value for money (1)
value iceberg (1)
values (3)
video (5)
video series (7)
virtual (2)
visionary evaluation (6)
visualise data (10)
vlookup (1)
Voices (1)
VOPEs (2)
WBG (1)
web (1)
webinar (1)
weighting (1)
word cloud (1)
word tree (1)
World Vision (1)
writeshop (3)
YEE (3)

Back to top

More menu anchor

BetterEvaluation is part of the Global Evaluation Initiative, a global network of organizations and experts supporting country governments to strengthen monitoring, evaluation, and the use of evidence in their countries. The GEI focuses support on efforts that are country-owned and aligned with local needs, goals and perspectives.

Search

Attributing development impact: The qualitative impact protocol (QuIP) case book

QuIP and the Yin/Yang of Quant and Qual: How to navigate QuIP visualisations

Comparing QuIP with thirty other approaches to impact evaluation

Bath social & developmental research ltd. (BSDR) website